A number of fundamental molecular properties have been thought to have an idiosyncratic distribution on the tree of life, principally because they did not fit the archael tree. Yet these same molecular properties fit the eocyte theory perfectly. This is particularly true for the organization of ribosomal rRNA operons.
    Although it can not be easily explained by the archaebacterial theory, this pattern of rRNA operon organization fits the eocyte tree well. [Click to see the tree.] Only a single change of operon type is required to accommodate this distribution on the eocyte tree. Namely, the 16S-tRNA-23S-5S pattern found in eubacteria, halobacteria, and methanogens is substituted by the derived 16S-23S type at the position on the tree shown by the box. Depending upon the operon organization in Methanopyrus (presently unknown), the site of the box will be either before or after Methanopyrus branches. In either case, only a single change will be required. The archael tree, does not explain this distribution, unless one postulates multiple independent creations of operon types. Since ribosomal operon organization is generally regared as being a slowly evolving character, this again lends considerable support to the eocyte theory.
| Home | Introduction | The Diversity of Life | Ribosome Structure | Origin of the Nucleus | Sequence Analysis | Universal Tree of Life | Support for Eocyte Tree | The Eocyte Tree Makes Sense | Conclusions |